|
ASTP/Praxis Training Courses |
||||
|
24-26 January 2007, Dublin, Ireland |
||||
|
ASTP
is pleased to invite you to two three-day courses in |
||||
| Please click here for the complete programme of the Fundamentals of Technology Transfer (FTT) course. | ||||
| Please click here for the complete programme of the Advanced Licensing Skills (ALS) course. | ||||
| To register, please visit the main page of the courses: FTT or ALS. | ||||
|
Wednesday
24 January |
Thursday 25 January | Friday
26 January |
||
|
Course Director: Antonio Parada |
Course Director: Antonio Parada | Course Director: Antonio Parada | ||
| 09.00 – 09.15 | 08.45-10.15 |
09.00 – 10.00
|
||
| Course
Introduction |
Anatomy of a License Agreement - it's purpose, structure and essential terms | Marketing Technology - finding and communicating with potential licensees | ||
| A session that aims to breakdown the whole process of creating a license agreement with the issues that should addressed in the contract. The session will be put to practice with a case study to identify common mistakes done while drafting terms for a contract. | In
this session we try to identify ways
of finding and marketing to and
communicating with potential |
|||
|
|
||||
| 09.15 – 10.15 | 10.15 – 10.30 | |||
|
Evaluating
Technology Opportunities |
Intro on Peter Rabbit Case study | |||
| Case Study Exercise | ||||
| Very few of the disclosures
we receive are likely to form the basis of a good patent – fewer still (maybe
1 in 10) have any commercial potential. Moreover, we simply don’t have
the time to manage too many projects at once. How then should we evaluate
and rank the disclosures we get and how should we reject the ones that we
decide not to pursue. |
|
|||
| Penny Attridge, Quester, |
||||
| 10.15 – 10.45 COFFEE BREAK | 10.30 – 11.00 COFFEE BREAK | 10.00
– 10.30 COFFEE BREAK |
||
| 10.45 – 11.15 | 11.00 – 12.00 |
|
||
| Case Study Feedback | Case Study - 'Peter Rabbit goes licensing' - illustrating the mistakes that the innocent can make when negotiating agreements | Case Study –
The Photon counting |
||
| Antonio Parada/ |
This is
a semi-fictional Tech Transfer case which we take right the way from
invention disclosure a negotiated deal. The aim if thesession is to
integrate and apply all the elements of the course. A highly interactive
discussion-based session. |
|||
| 11.15 – 12.00 | 12.00 – 12:45 | |||
| Research Grants and Contracts - Our role in protecting foreground and background IP | ||||
| A great deal of IP results from research collaborations with industry and other PROs. This session identifies ways to take these technologies to society and to manage both the financial and intellectual property issues that arises from the contracts. |
|
|||
| 12.00 – 12.45 | ||||
| IP Primer: Patents - patent law and process - when to seek patent protection, patent strenght, patent agents and patent costs | ||||
| All about the path to patent filling and the key decision (and investment ) points along the way. | ||||
| 12.45 - 13.45 LUNCH | 12.00 – 12.30
|
|||
| 13.45- 14.30 | 13:45 – 15.15 | 12.30 – 14.00 | ||
| Non-Patent
IP – Copyright, design |
Negotiating and striking the deal | Proof
of Concept Fund, |
||
|
Not all IP is best protected by patents – in this session we present different types of intellectual property protection and try to evaluate what type suits best for a particular situation. |
New TT officers find negotiation a mysterious and difficult process – especially when up ‘against’ those (in industry) who have been doing it for years. In this session we discuss the way in which agreements are reached and what you should do to reach a positive and outcome. | There are more and more early-stage proof-of-concept, development and other early stage funds available to take technologies to a state in which they can be licensed. But it’s easy to waste such funds. Here we hear from an experienced fund manager on the dos and don’ts of investing at a very early stage | ||
| Peter Horn Møller
, Plougmann & |
Penny Attridge
, Quester, |
|||
|
|
Paul Roben, Director
Enterprise |
|||
|
|
||||
| 14.30 – 15.15 | Kevin Cullen, Glasgow University, UK | |||
| Contract Law- what you need to know to keep yourself out of trouble | ||||
| We are not expected to be legal experts but we are
expected to know the basics of contract law. In this short session we
attempt to cover the basics legal matters in a global market. |
||||
|
Yvonne McNamara, Partner at |
14.00 COURSE ENDS | |||
| 15.15 – 15.45 COFFEE BREAK | 15.15 – 15.45 COFFEE BREAK | |||
| 15.45– 17.30 | 15.45 – 17.00 | |||
| Engaging
Industry – what they want and don’t want from us – followed by
Stakeholders Panel |
Sealing the deal | |||
| The course offers a conversation between a university
representative and an industrial one. Here, the different points of view
will be highlighted, setting the stage for an insight view of what the
other side of the negotiation feels. |
It’s easy to exchange technical information with licensees and to discuss technologies – without ever gaining commitment (and ultimately, a deal). We often seem afraid of being seen to ‘push’ for fear as being seen to be ‘pushy’. What are the techniques we should use to ‘close’ licensing agreements? | |||
|
|
Eoin O’Neill, Director of Entrepreneurship Trinity College Dublin, Ireland, together with: | |||
| Speaker from industry t.b.a. | Margaret Woods, Technology Transfer Manager, |
|||
| 18.30 SOCIAL PROGRAMME | ||||
|
ASTP/Praxis Training Courses |
||||
|
24-26 January 2007, Dublin, Ireland |
||||
|
Wednesday 24 January |
Thursday 25 January | Friday
26 January |
||
|
Course Director: |
Course
Director: |
Course
Director: |
||
| 09.00 – 09.15 | 08.30
– 09.30 |
08.30 – 10.00
|
||
| Co |
Deal
Strategy – The Essence of a Good Deal |
Case Study |
||
| You have your great technology and one or more
potential licensees. Negotiations are about to start. What do you want to
get out of the deal and how do you get there? This session will look at
the components of a deal strategy to help you obtain your goals. We will
discuss the term “good deal” and what we understand by it. |
This session comprises a series of short presentations
by the participants – each highlighting a particular licensing problem
or opportunity that will have ben discussed in groups. Each case is then
discussed by the entire group with input from experienced TT
professionals. |
|||
|
|
||||
| 09.15 – 10.15 | 09.30
- 10.30 |
|||
|
What
Industry Wants From Universities |
Deal
Strategy – The % and $ of a Good Deal |
|||
| Most universities today wish to develop close(r) links
with industry through various channels. One of those channels is of course
technology transfer. But do we actually know what it is industry wants
from us (apart from free IPR!!)? Could it be that we (TTOs) could develop
more customer-friendly approaches which would indeed meet the needs of our
external partners? |
Deciding what your
technology is worth and therefore what the licensee has to pay for it is
always tricky. This presentation will take us through some tips and
thoughts on how to construct the deal financially in order to get the most
out of it while helping the company develop your technology. |
|||
| Ciaran Regan, Associate Dean for
Research and Innovation ANRG, |
|
|||
| Michael Grufferty, Director of Industry & Innovation, Tyndall National Institute, Ireland | ||||
| 10.15 – 10.45 COFFEE BREAK | 10.30 – 11.00 COFFEE BREAK | 10.00 – 10.30 COFFEE BREAK | ||
| 10.45 – 11.45 | 11.00 – 12.45 |
|
||
| Developing
a Licensing Strategy |
Case: Maddie Ritchie’s Teething
Problems |
Key licensing issues | ||
| We need to be pro-active in
developing a commercial strategy – what are the first steps in
developing such a strategy and how far should you pla ahead? |
This case will take you
through the development of a case from the time a disclosure is
presented to the TTO through to the
process of licensing – focusing on all the legal and contractual issues
you will meet along the way. |
In
this session we examine a license deal from beginning to end – looking
at the deal from the perspective of the licensee and licensor. |
||
| Andrew Wettern, Wettern Ventures, UK |
Mark Anderson, Anderson & |
Tara MacMahon, IP Lawyer, |
||
| 11.45
– 12.45 |
11.15 – 12.00 |
|||
| Strategic
Licensing – a Real TTO Tale |
|
Case Study | ||
| In this session you will get an insight into the
strategic considerations in licensing from two renowned organisations in |
Alistair Payne and John Cahir,
Matheson Ormsby Prentice, solicitors, Ireland |
|||
|
|
||||
| 12.45 – 13.45 LUNCH | 12.00 – 12.30
|
|||
| 13.45
– 14.15 |
13.45 – 14.45 | 12.30 – 14.00 | ||
| Briefing,
feedback of case study |
Dirty
Little Tricks in Licensing |
Proof
of Concept Fund, |
||
| TTOs are often in the front-line and sometimes an
easy target for the experienced industry negotiator. This presentation
will expose some of the commonly used tactics that may be used on you, and
help you to recognise and deflect the worst of them. |
There are more and more early-stage proof-of-concept, development and other early stage funds available to take technologies to a state in which they can be licensed. But it’s easy to waste such funds. Here we hear from an experienced fund manager on the dos and don’ts of investing at a very early stage | |||
| 14.15 – 15.15 | 14.45 – 15.30 |
|||
|
|
Common
Pitfalls in Licensing |
Paul Roben, Director
Enterprise |
||
| This session will give you
tools and tips as to how to answer the essential questions which will help
you license your technology: How to find your licensees? What are their
goals? What is the potential value of your IP? Do you compare with other
similar technologies? If no comparable technology is available, can market
research be effective? |
|
Kevin Cullen, Glasgow University, UK | ||
| Cath Whitaker, Team services Ltd, |
Eoin O’Neill, Director of Entrepreneurship Trinity College Dublin,
Ireland, together with: |
|||
| Margaret Woods, Technology Transfer Manager, |
14.00 COURSE ENDS | |||
| 15. 15 – 15.45 COFFEE BREAK | 15.30 – 16.00 COFFEE BREAK | |||
| 15.45
– 16.45 |
16.00 – 17.00
|
|||
| Partnering
with businesses |
Post-signature
License Management |
|||
| How to identify an internal champion within a licensee?
How do you cultivate them, work with them and support them How do you use
the initial contacts to get information back that allows you to value the
technology? When should you abandon and how do you initiate
a possible lasting relationship? |
Many think that the TTO’s job is done once the
license is signed. If you take this approach then the dreamt-for royalty
payments may never materialise. It’s essential to periodically review
the agreement and meet with the licensee. In extreme cases you may need to
engage professional auditors to review the licensee’s progress and
products – and to have built in such a right into the original license.
This session – led by a highly experience IP auditor - is devoted to
examining post-license management. |
|||
|
|
Raja Sengupta, Equal Ltd, |
|||
| 16.45
– 18.00 |
17.00 – 18.00
|
|||
| Breakout
(I) – preliminary discussion of licensing problem/opportunity cases. |
Breakout (II) – preparation of group case study
presentation |
|||
| 18.30 SOCIAL PROGRAMME | ||||